Legal Opinion

Van Dort v. Culliton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1990No. S-3237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in awarding appellees 75% of their actual attorney’s fees following appellees’ acceptance of appellants’ offer of judgment under Civil Rule 68. We reverse the award and remand for further findings in light of our decisions in Day v. Moore, 771 P.2d 436 (Alaska 1989) and Myers v. Snow White Cleaners & Linen Supply, 770 P.2d 750 (Alaska 1989).

I

The Cullitons, owners of an allegedly defective condominium unit in the Spaulding Beach Condominium complex in Juneau, filed suit in February 1986 against developers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Haskins v. SheldenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McNett v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matter of Estate of BrandonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API