Legal Opinion

Humphries v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1980No. 55PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

G.S. 160A-38(h), as amended in 1977, provides that the appeal in annexation cases involving cities of less than 5,000 people is to the Court of Appeals. G.S. 160A-50(h) presently provides that the appeal in annexation cases involving cities of 5,000 or more people is to this Court. Therefore, petitioners properly appealed directly to this Court.

Review in the superior court and appeal to the appellate division in annexation cases are governed by G.S. 160A-50. G.S. 160A-50(f)(2) allows the petitioner to present evidence to show that the provisions of G.S. 160A-47 have not been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Prime South Homes, Inc. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API