State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motions for a bill of particulars, a new venire and two motions for continuances. These motions are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and they are not subject to review on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. Under the facts of the case before us, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions.
G.S. 15-143 provides that:
“In all indictments when further information not required to be set out therein is desirable for the better defense of the accused, the court, upon motion, may, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975