Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1975No. 7425SC896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The only assignment of error that defendant brings forward and argues in his brief is that the trial judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for a postponement of his trial. The reason stated for the motion was that just before defendant’s case was called for trial, another defendant, represented by the same attorney who represented defendant, had been tried on a charge of escape and convicted; that some of the same jurors who had served in the trial of the other case would be called to serve in the trial of defendant’s case. We find no merit in this assignment.

Rulings on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. HaltomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API