Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The defendant’s first contention in this Court is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance, thus depriving him and his counsel of adequate time in which to prepare his defense. Except where such motion is based upon a right guaranteed by the Federal or the State Constitution, it is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and the ruling of that court is not subject to review in the absence of an abuse of discretion. State v. Stepney, 280 N.C. 306, 312, 185 S.E. 2d 844; State v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 690, 174 S.E. 2d 526; State v. Moses, 272 N.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SearlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API