Legal Opinion

Hays v. Viscome

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1953No. Civ. 19752PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict in the sum of $700 as damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. She was a passenger in a car driven by John M. Teyshak, with the consent of the owner, John E. Haworth. The car collided with one driven by Cecelia Wekerle, which belonged to John A. Viseóme, and was being driven with his consent. She sued the four named persons; all of them except Teyshak were served with process and filed answers. She made a motion for a new trial, which was denied.

Plaintiff’s brief contains numerous assignments of error and also urges as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Freitas v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Gluckstein v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Delzell v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. In Re Marriage of HoffmeisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Talbert v. OstergaardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API