Legal Opinion

Fornaro v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1931No. 28,173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting judgment in favor of the defendant notwithstanding the verdict, made on defendant’s alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The action is one to recover damages for personal injury. The only question presented and argued here is whether the release given by plaintiff was a bar to recovery. Stated in other words, whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in setting aside the release on the ground that it was obtained by fraud or misrepresentations.

Plaintiff fell down the steps of one of defendant’s street cars on February 6, 1929,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Althoff v. TorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Mix v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dolgner v. Dayton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. West v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Yocum v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. JacobCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API