Dolgner v. Dayton Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtCoring, J.
Plaintiff, recovered a verdict of $1,360 against the defendant for personal injuries received while she was a customer in defendant’s store. The defendant appealed from an order denying its blended motion for judgment or a new trial.
• The principal question involved on this appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to justify the jury in finding that a release given to the defendant by the plaintiff was given under mutual mistake and therefore not a bar to plaintiff’s recovery in this action.
The plaintiff’s right shoulder was bruised by a cash box carried by one of the cash girls…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Fornaro v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HumphreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Collier v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
- Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- West v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Yocum v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.