Legal Opinion

Dolgner v. Dayton Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1931No. 28,281PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoring, J.

Plaintiff, recovered a verdict of $1,360 against the defendant for personal injuries received while she was a customer in defendant’s store. The defendant appealed from an order denying its blended motion for judgment or a new trial.

• The principal question involved on this appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to justify the jury in finding that a release given to the defendant by the plaintiff was given under mutual mistake and therefore not a bar to plaintiff’s recovery in this action.

The plaintiff’s right shoulder was bruised by a cash box carried by one of the cash girls…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Fornaro v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HumphreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Collier v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. West v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Yocum v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API