Legal Opinion

Mix v. Downing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1929No. 26,939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 222 N.W. 913. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

On April 7, 1924, plaintiff stepped on a defective manhole cover set in the sidewalk in front of the premises known as 386 Minnesota street in St. Paul, and because of its defective condition known to the defendant, the owner of the building, for some time, it tilted and his leg went into the hole receiving abrasions. The edge of the cover struck plaintiff in the lower region of the vertebrae making a black and blue spot.

The storeroom at this street number is leased by A. G. Spalding Bros. from…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Barron v. LiedloffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Tvedt v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API