People v. Chapman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks an order permitting him to' file a late notice of appeal pursuant to rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court. We have concluded that he is not entitled to the requested relief.
Petitioner was convicted after a jury trial in Sacramento Superior Court of attempted burglary. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 664.) He was sentenced to state prison on January 2, 1969. On May 21, 1969, almost five months after sentencing, he petitioned the Court of Appeal for rule 31(a) relief.
Petitioner made the following allegations in his petition: Upon hearing the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. DiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. FlanaganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. NewsomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.