Legal Opinion

People v. Flanagan

California Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1964No. Crim. No. 7654PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is another in a series of eases involving the proper interpretation and application of rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court.1 Several cases have already been decided involving the general problem (People v. Casillas, 61 Cal.2d 344 [38 Cal.Rptr. 721, 392 P.2d 521]; People v. Tucker, 61 Cal.2d 828 [40 Cal.Rptr. 609, 395 P.2d 449] ; People v. Johnson, 61 Cal.2d 843 [40 Cal.Rptr. 708, 395 P.2d 668]).

The facts of this case bring it within the rules announced in those cases.

Petitioner was sentenced for second degree murder on July 19,1963, after a trial without a jury. He was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. CasillasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re BenoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API