Legal Opinion

People v. Acosta

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1969No. Crim. No. 11587PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioner seeks an order permitting him to file a late.notice of appeal pursuant to rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court. , Rule 31(a) requires that notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 10 days after rendition of judgment but empowers appellate courts to grant relief from default in proper cases. This power is to be liberally exercised to protect the right to appeal. (People v. Camarillo, 66 Cal.2d 455, 456 [58 Cal.Rptr. 112, 426 P.2d 512]; People v. Buck, 65 Cal.2d 138, 139 [52 Cal.Rptr. 585, 416 P.2d 817]; People v. Casillas, 61 Cal.2d 344, 345-346 [38 Cal.Rptr. 721,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re BenoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Holt v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API