Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1993No. S022130PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 Cal.4th 813 (1993)

855 P.2d 391

21 Cal. Rptr.2d 373

In re CHARLES HARRIS on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. S022130.

Supreme Court of California.

July 29, 1993.

COUNSEL

Fern M. Laethem, State Public Defender, Michael Tanaka and Kent Barkhurst, Deputy State Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Marc E. Turchin and Stephen M. Kaufman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

LUCAS.C.J.

Charles Harris was convicted of second degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187,…

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. (HC) Barkley v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Ortega-Lara v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Vasquez v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Freddy Curiel v. Amy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API