Rath v. Rath

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his various motions, including motions for orders to show cause, for an ex parte interim order to modify a judgment, and for recusal. We conclude the district court did not err in refusing to hold Kayla Rath in contempt, did not err in denying his request to modify the judgment, and did not err in conducting a hearing on his motions. We further conclude' the court did not abuse its discretion in its award of attorney- fees to Kayla Rath and-in'-refus ing to recuse himself from this case. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In January 2013, Mark Rath…