Rath v. Rath
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mark Rath appeals from a district court order denying his motion for an order to show cause and denying his motion for relief. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Mark Rath and Kayla Rath were divorced in January 2013. Kayla Rath was awarded primary residential responsibility of the couple’s children. Mark Rath was awarded supervised parenting timé. The divorce judgment permits Mark Rath to call the children each Monday and every other Friday and Sunday between 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. This Court has decided various appeals in this case. See Rath v. Rath, 2016 ND 46, 876 N.W.2d 474…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Schweitzer v. MattingleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.