Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Ziebarth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. Civ. 930276PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Carol Ziebarth appeals from a supplemental judgment denying her motion to amend a prior judgment and assessing costs and attorney’s fees, and from an order imposing sanctions limiting her ability to further litigate the foreclosure of her property. We modify the order imposing sanctions and otherwise affirm.

Ziebarth and her husband defaulted on loans from the Federal Land Bank of St. Paul.1 In 1987, the Bank sued to foreclose on mortgages of real property securing those loans. Following a series of bankruptcy filings, dismissals, and appeals, we summarily affirmed judgment of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Edward M. Farguson v. Mbank Houston, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Bouchard v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API