Legal Opinion

Rath v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. 20170239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Rath appealed from the district court's second amended judgment modifying decisionmaking responsibility and parenting time, and from orders denying his other various motions. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial because no manifest injustice supports reversal, in denying his requests for recusal of the judge, and in denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In January 2013, Mark Rath and Kayla Rath, now known as Kayla Jones, were divorced. The divorce judgment awarded Kayla Jones primary residential…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Dick v. ErmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Senger v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. HunterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Schmidt v. HagenessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API