Legal Opinion
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Stevens
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendants moved for change of venue. The plaintiffs cross-moved to retain the venue and for summary judgment striking the answer.
It appears that, on July 10, 1956, the defendant Stevens, an employee of the State Department of Public Works, sustained injuries while in the course of his employment, through the negligence of a third party, Denver Chicago Trucking Co. Stevens made a claim for and was awarded workmen’s compensation benefits against the State Insurance Fund, the plaintiffs herein, as the carrier for the employer, to the extent of $1,119.31, being $691.20 for pay compensation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calhoun v. West End Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Ocean S. S. Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Claim of Beekman v. W. A. Brodie, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Drier v. Randforce Amusement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. ParrillaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. CrownAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. McCarthyNew York Supreme Court · 1962