Legal Opinion
Drier v. Randforce Amusement Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendant Bandforce Amusement Corp. has moved, pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, on the ground that its second affirmative defense — a plea of res judicata — is sufficient as a matter of law, the defense being founded on proof by documents and official records.
*363The papers before me are voluminous, but the material facts may be stated in briefest form. They are as follows: The plaintiff was a maintenance worker in the employ of the defendant Randforce. His task was to perform repair jobs at theatres operated by the defendant.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Silberstein v. . SilbersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Karameros v. LutherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Ogino v. BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- MATTER OF WEISS v. Franklin Sq. & Munson Fire Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bernstein v. Birch Wathen SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Rosinsky v. City of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Schnall v. 1918 Harmon St. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960