Legal Opinion

Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. McCarthy

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.

This is a motion and cross motion for summary judgment.

The action is to recover the balance of payment allegedly due under a lien created by section 227 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and which lien attached to any sum received by the injured party in an independent action for the injuries received.

The defendant, McCarthy, received specific disability benefits from the plaintiff from April 30, 1959 through November 9, 1959 under a disability coverage of her employer pursuant to section 211 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The disability was allegedly caused by an automobile accident in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Commissioners of State Insurance v. SimsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. King Metal Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commissioners v. GarciaNew York Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API