Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Parrilla
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel Sorkin, J.
This motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff is granted.
Plaintiff seeks judgment, against the attorney for an injured employee who recovered from a third party, on its lien for benefits paid pursuant to section 227 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
*836Defendant admits receiving notice of plaintiff’s lien and states that it was inadvertently overlooked when he distributed the recovery proceeds. He raises no issue of fact, but contends in a cross motion for summary judgment that the lien is not enforcible against an employee’s attorney.
Neither briefs submitted, nor independent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commissioners of State Insurance v. SimsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. FarvourDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neilson Realty Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Aiello v. LevineNassau County District Court · 1965
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WinsconsinUtica City Court · 1968
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. CrownAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
- Commissioners v. GarciaNew York Supreme Court · 2015