Ocean S. S. Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The sole question in this case is whether an employer who has paid compensation to an injured employee gets reimbursement out of the proceeds of a third-party action by the employee without proportionately sharing the cost of attorney’s fees. The district court decided that the plaintiff employer did not, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 39 F.Supp. 51, and it has appealed. We think this result is untenable under the governing statute. New York Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 29, Consol.Laws, c. 67.
The controlling provision of this statute is subdivision 1, which took its present form in 1937.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Curtin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Claim of Hobbs v. Dairymen's League Co-operative Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Hobbs v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Claim of Curtin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Ocean S. S. Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fontana v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Oleszczuk v. Calmar Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- Manion v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Tucker v. NasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Hardwick v. MunstermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.