Hightower-Warren v. Silk
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether the Superior Court properly affirmed the entry of a non-suit in a medical malpractice action, finding that Appellants’ claim could not proceed to the jury under a theory of res ipsa loquitur. We find that the Superior Court affirmance was improper as Appellants presented sufficient expert testimony and were entitled to proceed to the jury under a theory of res ipsa loquitur.
In May of 1987, Appellant Eunice Evans (“Evans”) saw Appellee, Raymond E. Silk, M.D. (“Dr. Silk”), for treatment arising from an automobile accident which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jones v. Harrisburg Polyclinic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Smith v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Grossman v. BarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.