Legal Opinion

Jones v. Harrisburg Polyclinic Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1981No. 80-2-261, 262PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NIX, Justice.

This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court1 remanding the instant medical malpractice action for a new trial. A divided Superior Court2 found that Mary Belle Jones and Barry L. Jones, plaintiffs below (appellants herein) failed to satisfy the requirements for the application of res ipsa loquitur and thus the trial court erred in allowing the jury to reach a verdict on that basis. We disagree.

On May 19, 1972, Mary Belle Jones underwent surgery at the Harrisburg Polyclinic Hospital to correct suspected gynecological problems on the advice of Dr.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API