Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Todd
In this appeal by allowance, we consider the admissibility of evidence regarding the risks and complications of a surgical procedure in a medical negligence case. For the reasons that follow, and consistent with our recent decision in Brady v. Urbas , 631 Pa. 329, 111 A.3d 1155 (2015), we find that *310evidence of the risks and complications of a surgery may be admissible at trial. Thus, we reverse the order of the Superior Court.
In May 2016, Appellant, Dr. Evan Shikora, was to perform a laparoscopic hysterectomy on Appellee Lanette Mitchell. Dr. Shikora, assisted by resident physician, Dr. Karyn…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Mazzie, W. v. Lehigh Valley HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- In Re: Est. of D.A.B., Appeal of: Byerley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Mazzie, W. v. Lehigh Valley HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Andrusis, C. v. Microvention, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Ashford v. CrullDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.