Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1990No. 1160PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Justice:

This appeal is brought by defendants Robert Keith Brooks and his employer, Bowers Trucking, Inc. after denial of their motion for post-trial relief. Judgment was entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County after a jury awarded damages to appellees Carl K. and Erma J. Smith for injuries sustained when Brooks, who was driving a coal truck for Bowers Trucking, hit the automobile in which Mr. Smith was a passenger. Two other defendants, Victor Desport and Farabaugh Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc. settled with plaintiffs after the jury trial and are no longer parties…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Klein v. HollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API