Legal Opinion

Scott-Huff Ins. Agency v. Sandusky

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1994No. 93-1219PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Timothy Sandusky, the appellee, sued Scott-Huff Insurance Agency (the Agency), the appellant, for negligence alleged to have resulted in Mr. Sandusky not having insurance to cover injury to a crane Mr. Sandusky owned and operated. A judgment, based on a jury verdict, was entered in favor of Mr. Sandusky. We reverse and dismiss the case because Mr. Sandusky was charged with the duty to know the coverage of the insurance policy. The Trial Court should have granted the Agency’s motion for a directed verdict. .

The bank financing the purchase of the crane for Mr. San-dusky…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nowell v. Dawn-Leavitt Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Bruner v. League General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stokes v. HarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Howell v. BullockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Flemens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Canal Insurance Company v. Rodney Dewayne AshmoreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Carco Rentals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API