Legal Opinion

Howell v. Bullock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 6, 1989No. 88-234PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The appellees were awarded a jury verdict in the amount of $38,460.00 on their complaint against the appellant for negligence in failing to procure the correct insurance coverage. The complaint alleged that the insurance agent failed to obtain the coverage requested on the appellee Gene Bullock’s motorcycle. For their appeal the appellants argue that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the issues and damages. Finding no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict, we must…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stokes v. HarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. DidierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Scott-Huff Ins. Agency v. SanduskySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API