Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1986No. 85-204PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Larry and Sylvia Stokes have appealed from a directed verdict on behalf of Sybil Harrell, doing business as The Harrell Agency.

In 1980 the Stokeses borrowed $25,000 and opened The Western Shop in Hampton, Arkansas. At the same time the Stokeses insured the contents for $20,000 from loss by fire through The Harrell Agency and a policy was issued by Granite State Insurance Company. About three years later Mr. Stokes told Mrs. Harrell that he wanted to increase the coverage to $50,000 and on April 11,1983 a new policy was issued by Granite State in the amount of $50,000. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
  2. Hill v. GrandeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Bicknell, Inc. v. HavlinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Nowell v. Dawn-Leavitt Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Bussey v. Bank of MalvernCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Flemens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Scott-Huff Ins. Agency v. SanduskySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API