Legal Opinion
Hendrickson v. Octagon Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 2, 2016No. Nos. 14-cv-01416 CRB, 14-cv-01417 CRBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Somewhere, Jerry Maguire is blushing. Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Doug Hendrickson and Cliff LaBoy, Jr. are professional sports agents who represent NFL players. For some time, both men worked at Defendant and Counter-Claimant Octagon, Inc. (“Octagon”), a sports agency that runs its NFL operations out of California.1 Hendrickson and LaBoy both signed employment agreements that gave the firm rights to the fees they earned from clients in exchange for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. v. McClendonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Six Dimensions, Inc. v. Perficient, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Compeer Financial, ACA, et al. v. Michael Graham, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Pamela Day v. Dustin BoyerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- VEBS, INC., a California Corporation v. LEON SIMONEAU, an individual, and DOES 1–10, inclusiveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.