Legal Opinion
Pamela Day v. Dustin Boyer
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 21, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01669Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 9 Central District of California 10 PAMELA DAY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01669-ODW (RAOx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. RENEWED MOTION FOR 13 DUSTIN BOYER, DEFAULT JUDGMENT [20] 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Pamela Day moves for entry of default judgment against Defendant 19 Dustin Boyer (“Motion”). (Renewed Mot. for Default J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 20.) For 20 the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion.1 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff Pamela Day initiated this action against Defendant Dustin…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.