Legal Opinion

Six Dimensions, Inc. v. Perficient, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 27, 2018No. Civil Action No. H-17-2680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID HITTNER, United States District Judge *643Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (Document No. 102) and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 104). Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines the motions should be granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a business dispute arising from a prior employment relationship between Plaintiff Six Dimensions, Inc., ("Six Dimensions") and Defendant Lynn M. Brading ("Brading"). On August 24, 2014, Six…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Six Dimensions, Incorporated v. Perficient, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API