Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Dias
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 2008No. AC 28487PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The plaintiff, Michael A. Sanders, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Jose C. Dias and Lisa M. Murray, in which the court concluded that the defendants had an easement by implication over a portion of the plaintiff s driveway. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment on the basis of a theory that was not pleaded in the defendants’ counterclaim, (2) applied the law regarding easements by implication, and (3) granted an overbroad and undefined easement to the defendants. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- D'AMATO v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- SFR INVS. POOL 1, LLC v. U.S. BANK, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- McBurney v. PaquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. OliphantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Council 4, AFSCME v. State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. LanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.