Legal Opinion

Marlow v. Orange County Human Services Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1980No. Civ. 21269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

The petitioner (Marlow) was accused by the Orange County Human Services Agency (agency) of violating one of the rules of the Methadone Maintenance Program. After a hearing of such accusation, Marlow was dismissed from the program. He sought a writ of mandate on the ground that the hearing was conducted improperly because, despite Marlow’s objection, the witnesses had not testified under oath. The trial court viewed this as error and issued a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the agency to hold another hearing at which the witnesses would be sworn. The agency appealed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Scannell v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Simpson v. GillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Reeves v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Todd v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. River Valley Reservation Project v. Metropolitan Transit Development BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Otay Ranch, L.People v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Broussard v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API