Marlow v. Orange County Human Services Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
The petitioner (Marlow) was accused by the Orange County Human Services Agency (agency) of violating one of the rules of the Methadone Maintenance Program. After a hearing of such accusation, Marlow was dismissed from the program. He sought a writ of mandate on the ground that the hearing was conducted improperly because, despite Marlow’s objection, the witnesses had not testified under oath. The trial court viewed this as error and issued a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the agency to hold another hearing at which the witnesses would be sworn. The agency appealed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Scannell v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Simpson v. GillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Reeves v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Todd v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- River Valley Reservation Project v. Metropolitan Transit Development BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Otay Ranch, L.People v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Broussard v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982