Legal Opinion

Rosen v. State Farm General Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2003No. S108308PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The insurance policy in this case defined “collapse” as “actually fallen down or fallen to pieces.” However, sound public policy, the Court of Appeal concluded, requires coverage for imminent, as well as actual, collapse, lest dangerous conditions go uncorrected. By failing to apply the plain, unambiguous language of the policy, the Court of Appeal erred. (Civ. Code, § 1644.) “[W]e do not rewrite any provision of any contract, [including an insurance policy], for any purpose.” (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. Superior Court (2001) 24 Cal.4th 945, 968 [103…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.(In Re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases)California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Global Eagle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. Assurance Company of America, a Maryland Corporation v. Wall & Associates LLC of Olympia, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API