Legal Opinion
Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 13, 2010No. 2:09-mj-00210PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, District Judge.
Pending before this court are two motions filed by defendant Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company 1 (“ERAC-Missouri” or “defendant parent”). The first is a motion to dismiss the amended master complaint with respect to claims asserted against defendant parent. (Docket No. 65, Misc. No. 09-210.) The second is a motion seeking summary judgment in favor of defendant parent on joint employer issues. (Docket No. 124.)
J. Procedural Background
The issues raised in the motion to dismiss the amended master complaint were briefed in connection with two motions to…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Gorton v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Garcia v. PetersonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Webb-Benjamin, LLC v. Int'l Rug Grp., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.