Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION No. 17-3895PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

In this Motion to Dismiss, the Court must decide whether it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants, Rakuten, Inc. ("Rakuten"), a Japanese corporation and holding company, and its direct and wholly owned subsidiary, Rakuten Baseball, Inc. ("Rakuten Baseball"), a Japanese corporation, and whether Plaintiff adequately stated plausible claims for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

II. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1. The Relevant Parties1

Plaintiff, Zachary Lutz, a former professional baseball player, played for the Tohoku *461Rakuten Golden Eagles (the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Torcup, Inc. v. Aztec Bolting Servs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Global Force Entm't, Inc. v. Anthem Sports & Entm't Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  4. Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. A. Neumann & Associates, LLC, et al v. NRC Realty & Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API