Legal Opinion
Gorton v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 2018No. Civ. Action No. 1:17–1110PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTI, Chief District Judge *286I. Introduction
Pending before the court in this asbestos case initiated by plaintiffs Thomas D. Gorton, II ("Mr. Gorton") and Rhonda J. Gorton (together with Mr. Gorton, "plaintiffs") is a motion to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 4) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and a motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Co. ("Pacific Bell"), Nevada Bell Telephone Co. ("Nevada Bell"), AT & T Corp.1 and AT & T, Inc. (collectively with Pacific Bell, Nevada Bell, and AT & T Corp., the "telephone defendants").2 Three main arguments are raised…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jackie L. Sullivan v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI))District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Webb-Benjamin, LLC v. Int'l Rug Grp., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Riffin v. Consol. Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Novinger's, Inc. v. A.J.D. Constr. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Carbonite Filter Corp. v. C. Overaa & Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.