Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Chadwick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 23, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The note in suit, which was payable on demand, was dated in April 1871,' and was overdue at the time it was indorsed by the payee Perry to the plaintiff. The defendant in set-off relied on a claim against Perry, and produced a note of other parties secured by a mortgage of personal property, dated in 1870, payable in three months after demand -to the order of Perry, which was indorsed by him to the defendant at the time when the note in suit was given, as the consideration for the same and for money then paid by the defendant to Perry. The mortgage was also assigned to the defendant at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Ladrick v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In re SwiftDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901
  3. Carmen v. HigginsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. McKay v. H. A. Hall & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Sandler v. ScullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API