Legal Opinion

Philo v. Lancia

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1967No. Civ. 8399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries suffered by Mm in an intersection automobile collision. The principal issue on this appeal is whether the court committed reversible error in giving an instruction on last clear chance.

Under settled rules the evidence will be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff.

The accident occurred about 4 p.m. on July 11, 1964, at the intersection of Oakwood and Live Oak Streets in the open desert area near Hesperia. Plaintiff, driving a 1963 Ford Econoline panel pick-up, was southbound on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Dodd v. HenkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Spann v. BallestyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API