Legal Opinion

Dodd v. Henkel

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1978No. Civ. 40313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

In an action to establish paternity and for child support, the jury returned a special verdict of nonpaternity. On appeal from the judgment entered in favor of respondent, appellant claims prejudicial error based upon (1) exclusion of testimony concerning inconclusive blood test results and (2) misconduct of counsel. We conclude that these claims are without merit; we affirm the judgment.

Statement of Facts

The facts disclosed by the limited record on appeal are undisputed: At some point during trial appellant made an in camera offer of proof that the medical expert…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Everett v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Midwife v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. County of Fresno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API