Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1952No. 246PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

Tbe defendant alleges that plaintiff’s intestate and bis employer were subject to tbe provisions of tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act; that tbe employer or bis insurance carrier has paid or admitted liability for payment of tbe compensation provided by said Act; and that this action, to tbe extent of such payment or admitted liability, is being maintained for and on behalf of tbe employer or bis insurance carrier as authorized by statute, G.S. 97-10. Apparently tbe facts thus alleged are not denied. In any event, for present purposes we may assume tbe facts are as alleged, and in discussing tbe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Archie v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. . CrandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fred M. Simmons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API