Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1976No. 11735PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, Morris A. Stroud and Marjorie Stroud, brought suit against the defendants below, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. and E. L. Farmer Construction Company, Inc., for industrial injuries sustained by Morris A. Stroud during construction of a sewage treatment plant for the City of Phoenix. From a defense verdict plaintiffs appeal, contending errors in the conduct of the trial.

Defendant Dorr-Oliver filed a third party complaint seeking indemnity from Allison Steel Manufacturing Company. E. L. Farmer Construction filed a cross-claim against Allison Steel for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API