Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lake & Peninsula Borough v. Local Boundary Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. S-5476, S-5485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This controversy concerns a portion of the Nushagak-Mulchatna watershed in Southwest Alaska. The Lake & Peninsula Borough (Borough), incorporated in 1989, originally encompassed a portion of the watershed within its northwest boundary. The “Nushagak villages” 1 and other respondents/cross-petitioners (Villages) are not located within the Borough, but rather represent subsistence users of the watershed.

A. FACTS

The Borough was the product of a hurried incorporation effort promoted by the Lake & Peninsula School District (District). 2…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Board of Trade, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Alaska Public Utilities Commission v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API