Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Towndrow

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1944No. 4860PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREET, Justice.

The plaintiff, who comes before us as appellee, has moved to dismiss this appeal from an order striking an amended counterclaim interposed by the defendants (appellants) to the complaint in an action brought against them on a note in which it is alleged they executed and delivered to appellee’s testatrix during her life time. Previously to the entry of the order appealed from, an order striking the counterclaim, of which the latter was amendatory, had been entered. The appellee urges, as a ground for dismissing the appeal, that the amended counterclaim is a mere restatement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Reppond v. National Life Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Montoya v. Anaconda Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. B. L. Goldberg & Associates, Inc. v. Uptown, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Johnson v. C & H CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Clancy v. GoodingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API