Legal Opinion
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1547PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
The Poultry Products Inspection Act (“PPIA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 451-472 (2012), requires the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to protect consumer health and welfare by ensuring that poultry products are wholesome and not adulterated, and are also properly marked, labeled, and packaged. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 451, 455, 457. To carry out this mission, the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (“FSIS”) has traditionally promulgated regulations that require federal inspectors to be stationed at fixed points along the…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- New England Anti-Vivisection Society v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- California Clinical Laboratory Association v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- AARP v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Federal Forest Resource Coalition v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.