Legal Opinion

California Clinical Laboratory Association v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 20, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0673PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs California Clinical Laboratory Association (“CCLA”) and Jane'Doe have brought the instant action to challenge certain Medicare coverage determinations that private entities — known as Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”)— make. Congress has expressly authorized Defendant Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to use MACs to help administer the Medicare program, and under the existing statutory and regulatory scheme, MACs routinely establish local Medicare coverage…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edwin R. Banks v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  2. Popkin v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Feldman v. BowserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Nucor Steel-Arkansas v. PruittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Feldman v. BowserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API