Legal Opinion

Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 22, 2015No. 15-5037PublishedCited by 355 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT.

WILKINS, Circuit Judge:

Margaret Sowerwine and Jane Foran, individual consumers of poultry, and Food & Water Watch, Inc. (“FWW”), their organizational advocate, fear that new regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) may result in an increase in foodborne illness from contaminated poultry. To prevent the regulations from going into effect, Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by355 opinions

  1. Chantal Attias v. CareFirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Make The Road New York v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  4. Victor K. Williams v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Speech First, Incorporated v. Gregory FenvesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

350 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API