Legal Opinion

Barber v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1972No. 42056PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This is an action to recover on an accidental death insurance policy issued to appellant’s husband, or, in the alternative, to recover damages for alleged delay in issuance of the policy.

Desirous of obtaining accidental death coverage, Harrison *141L. Barber and his wife Mary Jane Barber responded to an advertisement published in a national magazine by Bankers Life and Casualty Company.

Subsequently, the insurer’s agent visited the Barbers at their home on the evening of October 16, 1968 and insurance applications for both the Barbers were completed. Certain questions were asked of the Barbers and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Maki v. Aluminum Building ProductsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hein v. Family Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API