Legal Opinion

Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1966No. 38347PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, J. †

Plaintiff Donald K. Meissner appeals from an adverse ruling made upon a motion for summary judgment whereby his cause against defendant Simpson Timber Company was dismissed.

The complaint alleged two causes of action, both of which were dismissed under motions for summary judgment. The dismissal of the second cause of action, which sounded in unjust enrichment, is not appealed from by plaintiff. Plaintiff’s first cause was predicated upon an alleged promise by defendant company to pay to him, as compensation for an assignment of his rights in an invention, an extraordinary bonus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API